Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/16/2006

State v. Edwards

Citations

281 Kan. 1334
135 P.3d 1251
2006 Kan. LEXIS 367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

defining illegal sentence and holding it does not include “a sentence [that] fails to conform to constitutional requirements”
Multiplicity is not a claim that can be raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence.
Multiplicity is not a claim that can be raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence.
\ 'Statutory provision' as applicable to K.S.A. 22-3504 [1] is the statute defining the crime and assigning the category of punishment to be imposed.\
\A claim that a sentence fails to conform to constitutional requirements is not a claim it fails to conform to statutory requirements.\
K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 22-3504 applies only to \the statute defining the crime and assigning the category of punishment to be imposed\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.