Skip to main content

Stewart v. State

Citations

  • 444 P.3d 955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a judge doesn't hold a \hearing\ under the Due Process Clause when it considers the State's response to a K.S.A. 60-1507 motion
  • noting no state or federal constitutional right to pursue a postconviction collateral attack
  • finding district court must appoint counsel for indigent 3 K.S.A. 60-1507 movant only if it holds hearing at which State is represented by counsel; not required to appoint counsel if considering only written argument from counsel for State
  • No. 115,147, this day decided
  • No. 115,149, this day decided
  • No. 115,149, this day decided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.