Supreme Court of Kansas· 3/28/1986

State v. Van Cleave

Citations

716 P.2d 580
239 Kan. 117
1986 Kan. LEXIS 278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing appellate court discretion to order remand as an alternative and more expeditious remedy to K.S.A. 60-1507 to pursue ineffective assistance of counsel allegations
explaining that appellate counsel must generally do some preliminary investigation before requesting remand for Van Cleave hearing
allowing amendment because no alibi defense was asserted and the date of the offense was not material to any defense; no prejudice was shown
acknowledging appellate court's authority to remand ineffective assistance of counsel challenges to the trial court for an initial determination
finding that where a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is raised for the first time on appeal, \[t]he trial judge should be the first to make a determination of such an issue and our refusal to consider the matter for the first time on appeal is sound.\
overruling State v. Pink, 236 Kan. 715, 696 P.2d 358 [1985]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.