Skip to main content

Thompson v. State

Citations

  • 804 N.E.2d 1146
  • 2004 Ind. LEXIS 290
  • 2004 WL 557368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reaching alternative inferences is a function of the trier of fact, and we therefore cannot reverse a conviction merely because a different inference might plausibly be drawn from the evidence
  • concluding the factfinder is “entitled to decide whether to accept or reject testimony that represents a witness’s opinion,” including an expert witness’s opinion
  • stressing that the “privilege of self- defense does not accrue until there is the appearance of danger, either real or imaginary”
  • explaining that “factfinders are not required to believe a witness’s testimony even when it is uncontradicted”
  • stating that reviewing courts only look to whether the inferences supporting the trial court’s judgment were reasonable, not whether other, “more reasonable” inferences could have been made
  • holding evidence supported trial court’s finding that defendant was guilty but mentally ill despite expert witness opinions that defendant did not appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions at the time of the offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.