Skip to main content
· 11/15/2012

In the Matter of the Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of A.P. & Au.P. M.H. & T.P. v. The Indiana Dept. of Child Services

Citations

  • 981 N.E.2d 75
  • 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a trial court should consider a parent’s habitual pattern of conduct to determine whether there is a substantial probability of future neglect or deprivation
  • father’s failure to attend proceedings resulted in “no evidentiary basis to allow the trial court to conclude that Father’s neglect would not continue”
  • “trial court should judge a parent’s fitness to care for her child as of the time of the termination proceedings, taking into consideration evidence of changed conditions”
  • quoting, Lang, 861 N.E.2d at 373

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pyle, Friedlander, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.