· 11/15/2012
In the Matter of the Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of A.P. & Au.P. M.H. & T.P. v. The Indiana Dept. of Child Services
Citations
- 981 N.E.2d 75
- 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a trial court should consider a parent’s habitual pattern of conduct to determine whether there is a substantial probability of future neglect or deprivation
- father’s failure to attend proceedings resulted in “no evidentiary basis to allow the trial court to conclude that Father’s neglect would not continue”
- “trial court should judge a parent’s fitness to care for her child as of the time of the termination proceedings, taking into consideration evidence of changed conditions”
- quoting, Lang, 861 N.E.2d at 373
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pyle, Friedlander, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.