Indiana Court of Appeals· 4/30/2004
Carson v. State
Citations
- 807 N.E.2d 155
- 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 792
- 2004 WL 914637
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that, just after the attempted murder, defendant's statement to eyewitness that \they had to leave\ suggested sanity
- noting that our supreme court in Thompson reaffirmed that the finder of fact is entitled to decide whether to credit the opinions of experts on insanity, even in the absence of lay witness testimony
- “The ‘insanity’ defense is an affirmative defense for which the burden of proof is on the defendant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bailey, Najam, Robb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Moon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-03-09· cited 30×
- Lori Barcroft v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2018-12-03· cited 14×
- Christopher J. Robbins v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-07-17
- Christine M Anderson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2024-06-24
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.