Chandler v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a jury verdict because “the contraband was found in an undisclosed location in a middle bedroom and in the living room” and “not close to or intermingled with items” that the defendant owned
• reversing a jury verdict because “the contraband was found in an undis- closed location in a middle bedroom and in the living room” and “not close to or intermingled with items” that the defendant owned
• “[T]he law infers the party in possession of the premises is capable of exercising dominion and control over all items on the premises.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wheeler v. Lawson
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-08-21· cited 465×
• Gray v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-03-08· cited 3×
• Levenduski v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-11-21· cited 1×
• Wheeler, Michelle v. Lawson, Ronald
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-08-21
• Robert L. Dowell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-12-30

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thompson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2004-03-23· cited 150×
• White v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2002-08-01· cited 114×
• Gee v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2004-06-17· cited 89×
• Davenport v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-06· cited 70×
• Martin v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1978-02-21· cited 59×
• Polk v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-07-23· cited 30×
• Herron v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-05-17· cited 18×
• Smith v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-04-30· cited 4×