Indiana Supreme Court· 2/22/2012

Addison v. State

Citations

962 N.E.2d 1202
2012 Ind. LEXIS 20
2012 WL 560081

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the removal of the only African-American juror raises an inference of racial discrimination
explaining that while it is technically “incorrect” for a trial court to “conflate” the second and third step of a Batson inquiry, the defendant had “offered the trial court no reason to cast doubt on the State’s explanation for the strike”
applying the fundamental error doctrine where a defendant failed to object to the State’s proffered race-neutral explanation
a defendant may not argue one ground for objection at trial and then raise new grounds on appeal
“The analytical structure established by Batson cannot operate properly if the second and third steps are conflated.”
“Purposeful racial discrimination in selection of the venire violates a defendant’s right to equal protection because it denies him the protection that a trial by jury is intended to secure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, David

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.