Skip to main content

Galloway v. State

Citations

  • 938 N.E.2d 699
  • 2010 Ind. LEXIS 806
  • 2010 WL 5178067

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[a] successful insanity defense results in the defendant being found not responsible by reason of insanity”
  • explaining that in order to establish an insanity defense, a defendant must prove that this mental illness rendered him unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct at the time of the offense
  • explaining that “a defendant who is mentally ill but fails to establish that he or she was unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of his or her conduct may be found guilty but mentally ill”
  • explaining that “a defendant who is mentally ill but fails to establish that he or she was unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of his or her conduct may be found guilty but mentally ill”
  • noting that a standard of review “under which appellate courts merely ‘rubber stamp’ the fact finder’s determinations, no matter how unreasonable, would raise serious constitutional concerns because it would make the right to an appeal illusory”
  • stating \demeanor evidence before and after a crime is of more limited value than the defendant's demeanor during the crime\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Rucker, David, Shepard, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.