Thompson v. Relationserve Media, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining even weak and self-serving evidence is enough support to preclude Rule 11 sanctions
• Tjoflat, J., concurring in the appeal, No. 07-13225, and dissenting in the cross-appeal, No. 07-13477
• “[A] primary violation of the securities law is an essential element of a § 20(a) derivative claim . . . . As the . . . Complaint failed to allege primary liability under § 10(b), there can be no secondary liability under § 20(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).