Robert Garfield v. NDCHealth Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the success of [plaintiff]'s section 20(a) claim turns on the resolution of its claims under Section 10b and Rule 10b-5\
• concluding that the complaint failed to create a strong inference of scienter because, among other things, it contained “no allegations ... that indicate the presence of ... ‘red flags’ in the company’s financial statements”
• concluding that allegations about what was said at a meeting involving senior executives was insufficiently particularized where the complaint “failed to allege what was said at the meeting, to whom it was said, or in what context”
• concluding that allegations about what was said at a meeting involving senior executives was insufficiently particularized where the complaint “failed to allege what was said at the meeting, to whom it was said, or in what context”
• holding that corporation’s increase of “its allowance for doubtful accounts” to “nearly seven times the average” was not “so irregular” that the auditor should have been on notice of fraud
• holding that a dismissal can be final even before leave to amend expires

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).