Eleventh Circuit· 10/12/2006

Robert Garfield v. NDCHealth Corporation

Citations

466 F.3d 1255
2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 25435
2006 WL 2883238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that \the success of [plaintiff]'s section 20(a) claim turns on the resolution of its claims under Section 10b and Rule 10b-5\
concluding that the complaint failed to create a strong inference of scienter because, among other things, it contained “no allegations ... that indicate the presence of ... ‘red flags’ in the company’s financial statements”
concluding that allegations about what was said at a meeting involving senior executives was insufficiently particularized where the complaint “failed to allege what was said at the meeting, to whom it was said, or in what context”
concluding that allegations about what was said at a meeting involving senior executives was insufficiently particularized where the complaint “failed to allege what was said at the meeting, to whom it was said, or in what context”
holding that corporation’s increase of “its allowance for doubtful accounts” to “nearly seven times the average” was not “so irregular” that the auditor should have been on notice of fraud
holding that a dismissal can be final even before leave to amend expires

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Birch, Alarcón

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

134 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.