Supreme Court· 2/28/1995

Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.

Citations

513 U.S. 561
115 S. Ct. 1061
131 L. Ed. 2d 1
1995 U.S. LEXIS 1804
63 U.S.L.W. 4165
8 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 603
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

ruling that identical terms in different parts of 1933 Act are intended to have the same meaning — in context of term \prospectus\
holding that § 12(a)(2) does not relate to private sales or sales of securities in secondary market, i.e. shares that have been sold previously
concluding that “[t]he intent of Congress and the design of the statute require that § 12[ (a)](2) liability be limited to public offerings”
holding that where legislative history is considered, “it is preferable to consult the documents prepared by Congress while deliberating”
ruling that identical terms in different parts of 1933 Act are intended to have the same meaning — in context of term “prospectus”
recognizing that “[t]he intent of Congress and the design of the statute' require that § 12[ (a) ](2) liability be limited to public offerings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Thomas, Scalia, Ginsburg, Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

882 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.