Skip to main content
· 1/20/2011

Dronsejko v. Thornton

Citations

  • 632 F.3d 658
  • 78 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 755
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 1052
  • 2011 WL 167245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the auditor’s resolution of an ambiguous auditing standard did not support a finding of recklessness
  • noting that, when “Plaintiffs s[eek] relief from an order dismissing the case, not from the result of a trial,” the “required showing under Rule 60(b)(2) remains the same”
  • upholding denial of motion for reconsideration where movant “never adequately explained why they could not have discovered the evidence.”
  • noting Kirby McInerny as lead class counsel in 8 securities action
  • “A company’s management—not the auditor—is responsible for the information contained in its financial statements and the propriety of its underlying accounting policies, including compliance with GAAP.”
  • “Of course, in this case the Plaintiffs sought relief from an order dismissing the case, not from the result of a trial — but the required showing under Rule 60(b)(2) remains the same.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Kelly, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.