Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 1/20/2004

Rombach v. Chang

Citations

  • 355 F.3d 164
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “expressions of puffery and corporate optimism do not give rise to securities violations”
  • holding that even if plaintiffs had alleged that defendants engaged in a series of acquisitions in order to increase their executive compensation, the complaint would still fail to allege the requisite motive
  • holding that complaint may establish scienter through facts showing that defendants “had both motive and opportunity to commit fraud”
  • stating that plaintiffs “need allege no more than negligence to proceed” under sections 11 and 12(a)(2)
  • explaining that, “[u]p to a point, companies must be permitted to operate with a hopeful outlook”
  • determining that claims concerning “the duty to make a reasonable and diligent investigation of the statements contained in the Prospectus” sounded in negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

252 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.