Second Circuit· 6/21/2000

Novak v. Kasaks

Citations

216 F.3d 300
2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 14349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that scienter may be predicated on allegation that defendants “failed to review or check information that they had a duty to monitor”
holding that a qualitative statement that inventory was “in good shape” while defendants knew the contrary was actionable
holding that a securities fraud claim cannot be based on information that later becomes available to the defendants
holding that, while the PSLRA “may compel revelation of confidential sources under certain circumstances,” there was no per se requirement of disclosure if the plaintiff states sufficient facts to support plaintiffs allegations
holding that, while the PSLRA “may compel revelation of confidential sources under certain circumstances,” there was no per se requirement of disclosure if the plaintiff states sufficient facts to support plaintiffs allegations
holding that sources need not be named “provided they are described ... with sufficient particularity to support the probability that a person in the position occupied by the source would possess the information alleged”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

341 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.