Skip to main content
· 5/1/1996

TEC Engineering Corp. v. Budget Molders Supply, Inc.

Citations

  • 82 F.3d 542
  • 1996 WL 199619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that district court's \decision to grant or deny a preliminary injunction must be supported by adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law\
  • remanding case where court would have to resort to speculation to determine the basis for the district court’s decision
  • remanding case about trade dress of industrial conveyors for explicit findings of fact
  • remanding to district court where court “unable to engage in meaningful appellate review”
  • remanding case about trade.dress of industrial conveyors for explicit findings of fact
  • “[T]he district court’s 8 findings need not be overly detailed, and they do not bind the court in subsequent proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.