Skip to main content
· 8/8/1983

John H. Harland Company, Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 711 F.2d 966
  • 219 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 515
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that both the descriptiveness of the mark and the extent of third-party use “should be considered when analyzing the strength of a particular trademark”
  • collecting cases standing for the proposition that extent of third-party use is an important factor in determining the distinctiveness and thus the strength of the mark
  • vacating an injunction that did not “adequately specif[y] the acts which [the defendant] must discontinue in order to avoid infringing” the plaintiff’s trade dress
  • collecting cases standing for the proposition that extent of third-party use is an important factor in determining the distinctiveness and thus the strength of the mark
  • noting that a mark may, “by reason of subsequent use and promotion, acquire such distinctiveness that it can 5 Case: 17-15226 Date Filed: 05/21/2019 Page: 6 of 19 function as a significant indication of a particular producer as source of the goods with which it is used”
  • \although we would not necessarily have found a likelihood of confusion on these facts ... we affirm\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: III, Hill, Anderson, Lynne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.