Skip to main content
· 6/19/2009

Francisco Sanchez v. Esso Standard Oil Co.

Citations

  • 572 F.3d 1
  • 69 ERC (BNA) 1053
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 13175
  • 2009 WL 1708203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing Commonwealth's suit to protect \waters of the Commonwealth” generally from \the potential contamination and clean-up of one particular property” in plaintiffs' suit
  • \[T]he purpose of a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status quo before the merits have been resolved.\
  • “Whether a plaintiff in a Title VII action has timely exhausted her 21 administrative remedies is an affirmative defense, [so] the defendant bears the burden of pleading 22 and proving it” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “To support a lack of credibility finding, the ALJ [is] 20 required to ‘point to specific facts in the record which demonstrate that [the 21 1 claimant] is in less pain than she claims.’” (quoting Dodrill v. Shalala, 12 F.3d 915, 2 918 (9th Cir. 1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lipez, Hansen, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.