I.P. Lund Trading ApS v. Kohler Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that evidence of long and exclusive use provides evidence in favor of secondary meaning
• considering consumer surveys conducted in 1999 and 2000, several years after the defendant entered the relevant market in 1996, in its secondary meaning analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).