Skip to main content
· 12/17/1996

Doe v. Weld

Citations

  • 954 F. Supp. 425
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20064
  • 1996 WL 769398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that application of the Act to a level-one juvenile sex offender did not violate his plea agreement
  • because juvenile sex offender registration requirements are probably not punishment, plaintiff could not succeed on claim that imposition of requirements constituted cruel and unusual punishment
  • because juvenile sex offender registration requirements are probably not punishment, plaintiff could not succeed on claim that imposition of requirements constituted cruel and unusual punishment
  • implied rejection of Mendoza-Martinez factors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.