Inverness Corporation v. Whitehall Laboratories and American Home Products Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Measured by the purposes of Rule 52(a), the, district court’s decision neither informs us as to its underlying rationale nor served to discipline its approach to the case before it.”
• district court decision granting a preliminary injunction in trade dress infringement action was inadequate under Rule 52(a) where the district court found a likelihood of confusion between the litigants’ products but failed to address secondary meaning and functionality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).