New Comm Wireless Services, Inc. v. SprintCom, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “given the complexity of the technology, the multiplicity of interests involved, and the tangled nature of the case, anything is possible”
• explaining that “if the moving party cannot demonstrate that he is likely to succeed in his quest, the remaining factors become matters of idle curiosity.”
• explaining plaintiff must show that defendant intended to interfere with contract and knew 13 interference would cause injury to plaintiff
• vacating a preliminary injunction because the movant did not establish a likelihood of success on the merits and noting that, in such a case, the remaining preliminary injunction factors become irrelevant
• declining to address other factors “absent a demonstrated likelihood of success”
• “[T]he sine qua non of this four-part inquiry is likelihood of success on the merits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).