Skip to main content

Smith, William A/K/A Bill Smith

Citations

  • 499 S.W.3d 1
  • 2016 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 89
  • 2016 WL 3193479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the Fourth Amendment complaint waived because the appellant did not secure a ruling on his objection founded upon that amendment
  • noting admission of evidence does not preserve error without adverse ruling on the record
  • “To preserve error, a party must, among other things, obtain a ruling on the complaint or object to the trial judge’s refusal to rule.”
  • “Even evidence that is improperly admitted is considered in determining whether the evidence is sufficient to support a conviction[.]”
  • “A motion for instructed verdict is essentially a trial level challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.”
  • “A motion for instructed verdict is essentially a trial level challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Richardson, Keasler, Hervey, Yeary, Meyers, Johnson, Alcala, Newell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Smith, William A/K/A Bill Smith

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.