Skip to main content

Ex Parte Smith

Citations

  • 185 S.W.3d 455
  • 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 426
  • 2006 WL 475313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a juror’s failure to truthfully answer questions put to him by the court may support a challenge for cause
  • holding that a constitutionally deficient jury charge, however, does not result in automatic reversal of a conviction under Almanza but we must also assess the harm that this deficient jury charge caused the defendant
  • stating that the Almanza1 standard applies to federal constitutional errors contained within the jury charge
  • stating that jury charge error in Ngo was constitutional
  • stating that jury charge error in Ngo was constitutional
  • \The Almanza standard applies both on direct appeal and on the review of habeas corpus applications.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Keller, Price, Womack, Johnson, Hervey, Keasler, Holcomb, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.