Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/5/2012

Flores, Ex Parte Gerardo

Citations

387 S.W.3d 626
2012 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1603
2012 WL 6027333

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the rationale for deference also disappears when the record does not support the habeas court’s findings
stating that the rationale for the deference we generally accord to habeas courts disappears when the factual findings fail to resolve the necessary factual issues
stating that defendant must overcome presumption that counsel’s decision not to call witness is sound trial strategy
observing that “the right to counsel preserves the fairness, consistency, and reliability of criminal proceedings by ensuring that the process is an adversarial one.”
observing that “the right to counsel preserves the fairness, consistency, and reliability of criminal proceedings by ensuring that the process is an adversarial one”
observing that “right to counsel preserves the fairness, consistency, and reliability of criminal proceedings by ensuring that the process is an adversarial one”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Alcala, Keller, Hervey, Price, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

119 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Flores, Ex Parte Gerardo

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.