Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 834 P.2d 1325
  • 251 Kan. 272
  • 1992 Kan. LEXIS 149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A proceeding under K.S.A. 60-1507 cannot ordinarily be used as a substitute for direct appeal involving mere trial errors or as a substitute for a second appeal.”
  • no constitutional right to counsel in 60-1507 proceeding
  • “The evidence must be new.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett, Abbott, Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.