Skip to main content

State v. Andrews

Citations

  • 614 P.2d 447
  • 228 Kan. 368
  • 1980 Kan. LEXIS 335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing a K.S.A. 22-3501(1) motion for new trial based on grounds other than newly discovered evidence as “the customary motion for a new trial which must be filed within ten days”
  • “[Ojur statutes provide that an indigent defendant is entitled to counsel ... in habeas corpus proceedings and motions attacking sentence under K.S.A. 60-1507.”
  • “[H]abeas corpus proceedings and motions under 60-1507 are civil in nature and not controlled by the constitutional or statutory requirements applicable in criminal cases.”
  • defendant was not entitled to counsel under the Sixth or Fourteenth Amendment for his third motion for new trial
  • pro se documents considered motion for new trial
  • \Pro se pleadings are to be liberally construed.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.