Skip to main content
· 12/22/1994

State v. Goseland

Citations

  • 256 Kan. 729
  • 887 P.2d 1109
  • 1994 Kan. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • under the unusual facts of this case, the failure to order a third TCF report was not an abuse of discretion, and the district court did not deny the defendant the opportunity to file a motion to modify his sentence
  • no request or objection; instruction not clearly erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.