Skip to main content

Wilkins v. State

Citations

  • 190 P.3d 957
  • 286 Kan. 971
  • 2008 Kan. LEXIS 457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding newly disclosed evidence did not support a Brady claim where the defense was aware of it prior to trial
  • stating the “[mjere invocation of the word ‘strategy’ does not insulate the performance of a criminal defendant’s lawyer from constitutional criticism”
  • not ineffective for failing to cross-examine State's witnesses about plea agreement when information came into evidence through other witnesses
  • not ineffective for failing to cross-examine State's witnesses about plea agreement when information came into evidence through other witnesses
  • Sixth Amendment guarantees a criminal defendant the right to effective assistance of counsel
  • \We have previously observed that substantial questions of fact about the performance of trial counsel 'can best be evaluated by the judge who presided at trial.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, Davis, Greene, Johnson, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.