Supreme Court of Florida· 4/12/2001
Mitchell v. Moore
Citations
- 786 So. 2d 521
- 2001 WL 359630
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that the copy requirement of the Prisoner Indigency Statute resulted in an \insurmountable obstacle to a prisoner's right to access the courts\
- recognizing that the “pipeline” theory allows a defendant to seek application of a new rule of law if the defendant’s case is pending on direct review or not yet final at the time the new rule of law was announced
- “The right to access is specifically mentioned in Florida’s constitution. Therefore, it deserves more protection than those rights found only by implication.” (citation omitted)
- “Florida's constitution specifically guarantees a citizen's access to courts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Westerheide v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-17· cited 152×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-28· cited 124×
- Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-05-01· cited 123×
- Hernandez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-11-21· cited 86×
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-28· cited 76×
- State v. J.P.Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-11-18· cited 72×
- Geter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-27· cited 64×
- Laney v. Fairview CityUtah Supreme Court· 2002-08-09· cited 41×
- Richard O. Rambaran v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2016-05-09· cited 40×
- Chandler v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida· 2005-10-06· cited 34×
- Mehdipour v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2004-03-30· cited 29×
- Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-11-16· cited 27×
- Warren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-03-31· cited 26×
- Richard DeLisle v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 2018-10-15· cited 20×
- Emma Gayle Weaver, etc. v. Stephen C. Myers, M.D.Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-11-09· cited 18×
- Bunkley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-11-21· cited 15×
- Knarich v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-20· cited 13×
- Mehdipour v. State Ex Rel. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2004-03-30· cited 13×
- Smith v. FisherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-05· cited 12×
- Florida House of Representatives v. League of Women Voters of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-07-11· cited 12×
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 7,493×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 2,664×
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 1,427×
- State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-09-27· cited 507×
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court· 1897-05-24· cited 485×
- Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 430×
- Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-07-24· cited 342×
- Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-10-30· cited 271×
- Hodgson v. MinnesotaSupreme Court· 1990-06-25· cited 264×
- Smith v. Department of Ins.Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-04-23· cited 221×
- State v. CallawaySupreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 219×
- Kluger v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-11· cited 201×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-04-02· cited 169×
- Lasky v. State Farm Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida· 1974-05-28· cited 139×
- Koon v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-03-25· cited 104×
- State v. JohansSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-02-18· cited 81×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.