Skip to main content

Owen v. State

Citations

  • 596 So. 2d 985
  • 1992 WL 10615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding conspiracy could be prosecuted where agreement was reached in Florida even though overt acts took place elsewhere
  • holding the right to counsel is offense-specific: attachment and 14 invocation of the right on one charge imposes no restrictions on police inquiry concerning other charges against the same defendant
  • receding from Keen \to the extent it is inconsistent with the Sixth Amendment analysis above\
  • rejecting Keen’s suggestion that an otherwise voluntary statement given after twenty-four hours was per se inadmissible
  • “The term ‘arraign’ simply means to be called before a court officer and charged with a crime”
  • “The term ‘arraign’ simply means to be called before a court officer and charged with a crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.