Supreme Court of Florida· 10/7/1999
Bates v. State
Citations
- 750 So. 2d 6
- 1999 WL 817193
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the amended sentencing statute did not apply retroactively
- concluding that the amended sentencing statute did not apply retroactively
- rejecting the defendant’s argument that it would have been “relevant mitigation” for the jury to hear about his other consecutive sentences
- rejecting the defendant's argument that it would have been \relevant mitigation\ for the jury to hear about his other consecutive sentences
- “Retroactive application of the law is generally disfavored ... and any basis for retroactive application must be unequivocal and leave no doubt as to the legislative intent.”
- “Retroactive application of the law is generally disfavored . . . and any basis for retroactive application must be unequivocal and leave no doubt as to the legislative intent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Connor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-09-06· cited 331×
- Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-13· cited 204×
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-03-01· cited 143×
- Francis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-12-20· cited 120×
- Card v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-10-11· cited 117×
- Morrison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-21· cited 104×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-10-18· cited 100×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-05· cited 99×
- Deparvine v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-29· cited 95×
- Rimmer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-07-03· cited 92×
- Frances v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-10-11· cited 87×
- Singleton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-02-15· cited 85×
- Overton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-09-13· cited 80×
- Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-26· cited 79×
- Keen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-28· cited 74×
- Zeigler v. CrosbyEleventh Circuit· 2003-09-19· cited 72×
- Hayward v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-12-10· cited 70×
- Florida Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. BusterSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-03-06· cited 68×
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-06-03· cited 68×
- Guardado v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-06-28· cited 61×
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
- Franklin v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1988-09-15· cited 852×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-26· cited 745×
- Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-03-04· cited 391×
- Terry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-01-04· cited 247×
- Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-06-14· cited 233×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-06-22· cited 218×
- Willacy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 127×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-12-24· cited 116×
- Franqui v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-06-26· cited 102×
- Nibert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-07-26· cited 98×
- State v. LavazzoliSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-07-07· cited 95×
- San Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-12-24· cited 91×
- Nixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-29· cited 85×
- Mahn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-04-16· cited 80×
- Blanco v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-09-18· cited 77×
- Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-18· cited 75×
- Almeida v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-08· cited 75×
- Sliney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-07-17· cited 63×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-01-14· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.