Skip to main content

Bates v. State

Citations

  • 750 So. 2d 6
  • 1999 WL 817193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the amended sentencing statute did not apply retroactively
  • concluding that the amended sentencing statute did not apply retroactively
  • rejecting the defendant’s argument that it would have been “relevant mitigation” for the jury to hear about his other consecutive sentences
  • rejecting the defendant's argument that it would have been \relevant mitigation\ for the jury to hear about his other consecutive sentences
  • “Retroactive application of the law is generally disfavored ... and any basis for retroactive application must be unequivocal and leave no doubt as to the legislative intent.”
  • “Retroactive application of the law is generally disfavored . . . and any basis for retroactive application must be unequivocal and leave no doubt as to the legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.