Texas Supreme Court· 5/25/1977
Taggart v. Taggart
Citations
- 552 S.W.2d 422
- 20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 334
- 1977 Tex. LEXIS 239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that divorced spouse “owned as her part of the community estate a share in the contingent right to military benefits even though that right had not matured at the time of the divorce”
- holding that where the parties were married for 246 months of Husband’s 360 months of service, the correct computation of Wife’s vested interest was one-half of 246/360th’s of the retirement pay
- reforming the judgment \to adjudge the correct fractional interest\ to the non-working spouse
- reforming the judgment “to adjudge the correct fractional interest” to the nonworking spouse
- outlining formula for military-retirement benefits as months of service during marriage, divided by total months of service, and then multiplied by proportionate award to non-military spouse of community property
- reforming the judgment \ to distribution consisted of payments under the Shell Senior adjudge the correct fractional interest\ to the Staff Plan and the Benefit Restoration Plan, both of non-working spouse
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pope, Yarbrough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
120 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1984-02-15· cited 847×
- Sanchez v. SchindlerTexas Supreme Court· 1983-04-27· cited 318×
- Shanks v. TreadwayTexas Supreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 300×
- Reiss v. ReissTexas Supreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 275×
- Cameron v. CameronTexas Supreme Court· 1982-10-13· cited 259×
- McElwee v. McElweeTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-11-15· cited 231×
- Smith v. SmithTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-06-29· cited 228×
- Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-01-03· cited 198×
- Berry v. BerryTexas Supreme Court· 1983-03-09· cited 147×
- Nagle v. NagleTexas Supreme Court· 1982-06-02· cited 126×
- Gainous v. GainousTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-12-21· cited 117×
- Campbell v. Northwestern National Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1978-10-04· cited 98×
- Tanner Development Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court· 1977-10-19· cited 90×
- Stavinoha v. StavinohaTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-01-20· cited 87×
- Limbaugh v. LimbaughTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2002-02-06· cited 79×
- Baw v. BawTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1997-06-30· cited 73×
- McClary v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-01-17· cited 64×
- Morris v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-30· cited 55×
- Harrell v. HarrellTexas Supreme Court· 1985-07-10· cited 55×
- St. Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co., Inc. v. Dal-Worth TankTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1996-01-23· cited 53×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-01-16· cited 507×
- Busby v. BusbyTexas Supreme Court· 1970-07-29· cited 302×
- Cearley v. CearleyTexas Supreme Court· 1976-12-15· cited 243×
- McKelvy v. BarberTexas Supreme Court· 1964-07-08· cited 189×
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-01-16· cited 161×
- French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-04-21· cited 120×
- Mora v. MoraCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1968-05-15· cited 90×
- Kirkham v. KirkhamCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1960-04-20· cited 52×
- Webster v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1969-06-11· cited 39×
- Miser v. MiserCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1971-12-17· cited 38×
- Ables v. AblesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1976-08-19· cited 11×
- Freeman v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1973-06-20· cited 7×
- Taggart v. TaggartCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1976-08-30· cited 5×
Other cases named Taggart v. Taggart
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.