Skip to main content

Smith v. Smith

Citations

  • 22 S.W.3d 140
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 4348
  • 2000 WL 854853

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding under application of community-out-first presumption, where withdrawals from an account deplete community funds in the account, it is error to award any portion of the remaining separate property funds to other spouse
  • stating that “where there are sufficient funds at all times to cover the 28 separate property balance in the account at the time of divorce, we presume that the balance remains separate property”
  • “Failure by a party to request additional or amended findings or conclusions waives the party's right to complain on appeal about the presumed finding.”
  • “Generally, when separate property and community property are commingled in a single bank account, . . . and where there are sufficient funds at all times to cover the separate property balance in the account at the time of divorce, we presume that the balance remains separate property.”
  • presuming community funds are drawn out first
  • presuming community funds are drawn out first

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norman Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

190 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

69 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.