Skip to main content
· 6/26/2003

Shanks v. Treadway

Citations

  • 110 S.W.3d 444
  • 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 840
  • 2003 Tex. LEXIS 87
  • 2002 WL 32122827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court judgments should be construed as a whole, harmonizing and giving effect to all parts
  • holding that trial court judgments should be construed as a whole, harmonizing and giving effect to all parts
  • holding that trial court judgments should be construed as a whole, harmonizing and giving effect to all parts
  • holding that because modification of property division is prohibited, “the trial court had no authority to enter an order altering or modifying the original disposition of property”
  • declaring that party’s “remedy for a substantive error of law by the trial court was by direct appeal, and he cannot now collaterally attack the judgment”
  • stating that we “must effectuate the order in light of the literal language used”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.