Court of Appeals of Texas· 1/3/2002
Boyd v. Boyd
Citations
- 67 S.W.3d 398
- 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 16
- 2002 WL 5691
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a Section 6.602 MSA may be subject to rescission due to intentional nondisclosure
- “The fiduciary duty arising from the marriage relationship does not continue when a husband and wife each hire independent professional counsel to represent them in a contested divorce proceeding.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Livingston, Dauphinot, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
147 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re LeeTexas Supreme Court· 2013-09-27· cited 225×
- Barnard v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-04-01· cited 116×
- Milner v. MilnerTexas Supreme Court· 2012-03-09· cited 112×
- In Re the Marriage of JoynerTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-06-30· cited 109×
- Stavinoha v. StavinohaTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2004-01-20· cited 87×
- Raman Chandler Properties, L.C. v. Caldwell's Creek Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-10-13· cited 85×
- Brooks v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-26· cited 81×
- Loaiza v. LoaizaCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-04-29· cited 76×
- NP Anderson Cotton Exchange, L.P. v. PotterCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2007-07-12· cited 71×
- Sheshunoff v. SheshunoffTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-08-22· cited 71×
- Flood v. KatzTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2009-10-15· cited 58×
- Murray v. MurrayTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-01-22· cited 52×
- Boaz v. BoazTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-07-13· cited 49×
- Beyers v. RobertsTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-06-14· cited 41×
- In Re CalderonTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2003-02-05· cited 38×
- In Re the Marriage of NotashTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-09-26· cited 37×
- Spiegel v. KLRU Endownment FundTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-04-26· cited 37×
- Hawkins v. EhlerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-02-20· cited 36×
- Morales v. MoralesTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2003-01-23· cited 34×
- in the Interest of K.D., a Minor ChildTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-07-29· cited 34×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Murff v. MurffTexas Supreme Court· 1981-04-29· cited 988×
- National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. v. AllenTexas Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 670×
- Ltd. v. Williamson County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court· 1996-07-12· cited 667×
- Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court· 1995-10-05· cited 515×
- Cameron v. CameronTexas Supreme Court· 1982-10-13· cited 259×
- Cearley v. CearleyTexas Supreme Court· 1976-12-15· cited 243×
- Bell v. BellTexas Supreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 229×
- Smith v. SmithTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-06-29· cited 228×
- Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund v. Del Industrial, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2000-04-06· cited 197×
- Adams v. Petrade International, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1988-03-17· cited 184×
- Cadle Co. v. LobingierCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-21· cited 178×
- Douglas v. DelpTexas Supreme Court· 1999-04-29· cited 173×
- Taggart v. TaggartTexas Supreme Court· 1977-05-25· cited 162×
- Berry v. BerryTexas Supreme Court· 1983-03-09· cited 147×
- Smith v. National Resort Communities, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1979-06-27· cited 146×
- World Help v. Leisure Lifestyles, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-24· cited 144×
- Hitzelberger v. Samedan Oil Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1997-07-23· cited 119×
- Hatteberg v. HattebergTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-11-09· cited 104×
- Alcantar v. Oklahoma National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-05-31· cited 97×
- Osborn v. OsbornTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1997-10-20· cited 96×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.