California Supreme Court· 1/16/1976
Brown v. Brown
Citations
- 15 Cal. 3d 838
- 544 P.2d 561
- 94 A.L.R. 3d 164
- 126 Cal. Rptr. 633
- 1976 Cal. LEXIS 192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expressly overruling French v. French, 17 Cal.2d 775, 112 P.2d 235 (1941)
- expressly overruling French v. French, 17 Cal.2d 775, 112 P.2d 235 (1941)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tobriner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
137 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-01-16· cited 507×
- Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-04-21· cited 420×
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court· 1992-02-20· cited 408×
- Shanks v. TreadwayTexas Supreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 300×
- Taggart v. TaggartTexas Supreme Court· 1977-05-25· cited 162×
- Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-08· cited 162×
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal· 1997-02-07· cited 155×
- Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-04-08· cited 145×
- Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-01-29· cited 126×
- Piscitelli v. FriedenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-03-14· cited 115×
- In Re Marriage of GillmoreCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-06-08· cited 113×
- In Re Marriage of BuolCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-09-16· cited 107×
- Day v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1984-01-30· cited 100×
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-12-18· cited 93×
- In Re Marriage of HugCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-04-20· cited 80×
- In Re the Marriage of BroderickCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-04-07· cited 75×
- Ferguson v. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-06-09· cited 75×
- In Re Marriage of LehmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-05-28· cited 67×
- Casas v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-07-21· cited 67×
- Davis v. DamrellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-06-01· cited 63×
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court· 1974-03-25· cited 443×
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-12-02· cited 371×
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-06-21· cited 221×
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-04-01· cited 207×
- Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-06-30· cited 190×
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-06-06· cited 177×
- In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-01-03· cited 173×
- Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-09-23· cited 158×
- Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-01-20· cited 156×
- French v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-04-21· cited 120×
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1936-06-23· cited 101×
- Phillipson v. Board of Administration, Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-08-26· cited 98×
- Grimm v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court· 1945-03-27· cited 96×
- Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-08-27· cited 95×
- Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-01-14· cited 88×
- Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-09-28· cited 86×
- Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-02-11· cited 73×
- DeRevere v. DeRevereCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-11-18· cited 72×
- Packer v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court· 1950-04-25· cited 70×
- In Re Marriage of JonesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-02-07· cited 65×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.