Baw v. Baw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that husband did not consent to particular portion of decree because he testified that he did not agree with court’s determination regarding community interest in asset
• holding that husband did not consent to particular portion of decree because he testified that he did not agree with court’s determination regarding community interest in asset
• requiring such evidence to overcome waiver of issues for appeal of an agreed order
• explaining the difference between defined benefit plans and defined contribution plans
• even though husband approved as to form and substance, his objections showed he did not explicitly and unmistakably consent to portions of decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).