St. Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co., Inc. v. Dal-Worth Tank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming, based on similar jury question, attorney’s fee award that included prejudgment interest
• lulling party into inaction and subsequently searching for means to escape liability is unconscionable
• affirming, based on similar jury question, attorney’s fee award that included prejudgment interest
• affirming, based on similar jury question, attorney's fee award that included prejudgment interest
• inexplicably requiring showing of expenses deducted for its future lost profits analysis, but not for its past lost profits
• inexplicably requiring showing of expenses deducted for its future lost profits analysis, but not for its past lost profits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).