Idaho Supreme Court· 11/28/1990

Stuart v. State

Citations

801 P.2d 1283
118 Idaho 932
1990 Ida. LEXIS 192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

using Cory for general rule statements regarding the right to counsel
using Cory for general rule statements regarding the right to counsel
second application set forth facts, with accompanying affidavits, alleging newly discovered information not known to applicant at the time of the filing of the first petition
discovery that attorney-client interviews had been secretly taped provided grounds for post-conviction petition eight years after conviction
“Subsequent petitions are allowed if the appellant states a sufficient reason for not asserting the grounds in the earlier petition.”
Absent a showing of a sufficient reason for failure to raise a claim in an initial petition, “[a]ny grounds for relief not raised are permanently waived if the grounds were known or should have been known at the time of the first petition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDevitt, Bakes, Bistline, Johnson, Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.