Idaho Supreme Court· 12/4/2001

Stuart v. State

Citations

36 P.3d 1278
136 Idaho 490
2001 Ida. LEXIS 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that ruling necessary to decision becomes law of case and must be adhered to in subsequent proceedings
stating that “upon an appeal, the Supreme Court, in deciding a case presented states in its opinion a principle or rule of law necessary to the decision, such pronouncement becomes the law of the case”
“[T]he law of the case doctrine ‘directs a court’s discretion, it does not limit the tribunal’s power.’ ” (quoting Arizona v. California, 460 U.S. 605, 618 (1983))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kidwell, Schroeder, Walters, Eismann, Kosonen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.