Skip to main content

Stuart v. State

Citations

  • 907 P.2d 783
  • 127 Idaho 806
  • 1995 Ida. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the district court’s conclusion was clearly erroneous and remanding to the district court with instructions to weigh the evidence a second time
  • “[C]oncealment is one method of proving that the exculpatory value of the evidence was known to the government prior to its destruction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bistline, Johnson, Silak, Meehl, Tern, McDevitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.