Skip to main content
Idaho Supreme Court· 10/21/1992

Matthews v. State

Citations

  • 839 P.2d 1215
  • 122 Idaho 801
  • 1992 Ida. LEXIS 154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, in Idaho, “a petition for post-conviction relief is the preferred forum for bringing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel”
  • holding defendant may raise issue of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial either on direct appeal or in petition for post- conviction relief, but not both
  • district court may not take judicial notice of prior reported but untranscribed testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bistline, Bakes, McDevitt, Winmill, Tern, Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.