Skip to main content
Idaho Supreme Court· 12/13/1999

McKinney v. State

Citations

  • 992 P.2d 144
  • 133 Idaho 695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the “ineffectiveness of post-conviction counsel is not an independent ground for a subsequent post- conviction proceeding,” in the context of Idaho Code section 19-2719
  • noting that postconviction procedures affording additional review in death penalty cases do not extend to non-death sentences imposed on related convictions obtained in the same underlying trial
  • stating this time-bar principle in the context of a Brady claim
  • “Ineffective assistance of counsel in [a petitioner’s] first post-conviction proceeding does not excuse his failure to raise issues that should reasonably have been known.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kidwell, Schroeder, Silak, Trout, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.