· 3/6/2003
State v. Coney
Citations
- 845 So. 2d 120
- 2003 WL 838149
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that pure questions of law that are discerna-ble from the record are subject to de novo review
- holding that pure questions of law that are discernable from the record are subject to de novo review
- holding that pure questions of law that are discernable from the record are subject to de novo review
- holding that pure questions of law that are discernable from the record are subject to de novo review
- rejecting claim that defendant was insane to be executed where he acknowledged that claim was not yet ripe and was being raised only for preservation purposes
- rejecting claim that defendant was insane to be executed where he acknowledged that claim was not yet ripe and was being raised only for preservation purposes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.