Skip to main content
· 3/6/2003

State v. Coney

Citations

  • 845 So. 2d 120
  • 2003 WL 838149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pure questions of law that are discerna-ble from the record are subject to de novo review
  • holding that pure questions of law that are discernable from the record are subject to de novo review
  • holding that pure questions of law that are discernable from the record are subject to de novo review
  • holding that pure questions of law that are discernable from the record are subject to de novo review
  • rejecting claim that defendant was insane to be executed where he acknowledged that claim was not yet ripe and was being raised only for preservation purposes
  • rejecting claim that defendant was insane to be executed where he acknowledged that claim was not yet ripe and was being raised only for preservation purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.