Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 501 S.E.2d 523
  • 232 Ga. App. 290
  • 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 1834
  • 1998 Ga. App. LEXIS 578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing trial court’s discretion and finding it did not clearly err
  • evidence defendant previously attacked estranged wife admissible to show intent and disprove defense of accident
  • sua sponte charge on voluntary intoxication was proper in light of evidence that defendant drank three heers
  • where defendant claimed that he accidentally lit his girlfriend on fire while she slept, evidence admissible that defendant previously attacked and cut his estranged wife with a machete to show intent and disprove defense of accident
  • “the trial court retains the sound legal discretion to exclude relevant similar crimes evidence on the ground that its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice”
  • “[W]here intent may be easily inferred from the commission of the act itself, the probative value of similar transaction evidence proffered to prove intent will generally be outweighed by its prejudicial effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beasley, Pope, Banke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.