Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 541 S.E.2d 362
  • 273 Ga. 356
  • 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 325
  • 2001 Ga. LEXIS 60

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding intent, motive, and course of conduct were proper purposes for similar-transaction evidence under the old Evidence Code
  • stating that the Sixth Amendment “guarantee [s] effective assistance of counsel, not... preferred counsel or counsel with whom a ‘meaningful relationship’ can be established” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • when similar transaction evidence is admitted to show intent, course of conduct, and bent of mind, a lesser degree of similarity is required than when such evidence is introduced to prove identity
  • essential aim of the Sixth Amendment is to guarantee effective assistance of counsel, not to guarantee a defendant preferred counsel or counsel with whom a “meaningful relationship” can be established

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.