Skip to main content

Hunter v. State

Citations

  • 413 S.E.2d 526
  • 202 Ga. App. 195
  • 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1730

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding ‘nothing in . . . Williams suggests that the Supreme Court has determined to dispense with the longstanding rule that, to warrant appellate consideration, an objection to the admission of evidence must first have been raised in the trial court. . . .’
  • applying the standard rules to similar transaction evidence, over dissents by Chief Judge Sognier and Judge Beasley, who argued that no specific objection should be required in this context
  • holding `nothing in . . . Williams suggests that the Supreme Court has determined to dispense with the long standing rule that, to warrant appellate consideration, an objection to the admission of evidence must first have been raised in the trial court. . . .'
  • “nothing in ... Williams suggests that the Supreme Court has determined to dispense with the long-standing rule that, to warrant appellate consideration, an objection to the admission of evidence must first have been raised in the trial court”
  • failure to object on specific grounds at time similar transaction evidence is offered
  • objection at pretrial hearing to admission of evidence for one reason did not preserve for appellate review argument that evidence should not have been admitted for a different reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley, McMurray, Birdsong, Pope, Cooper, Andrews, Sognier, Beasley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.