Skip to main content

State v. Wright

Citations

  • 686 N.W.2d 295
  • 2004 Minn. App. LEXIS 1060
  • 2004 WL 2050528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that 911 call “moments after the criminal offense and under the stress of the event” was not testimonial
  • holding that 911 call \moments after the criminal offense and under the stress of the event\ was not testimonial
  • concluding that statements to 911 operator identifying defendant as assailant “do not fit within the definitions or the examples of ‘testimonial’ statements” contained in Crawford
  • avoiding this issue with a finding that the admission of the statement was harmless
  • 911 call made moments after crime occurred, where caller is still subject to the stress of the prior event, is not testimonial
  • victims’ statements to 911 operator seeking help immediately after assault not testimonial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hudson, Lansing, Willis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.