United States v. Gerald R. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that police officers did not coerce an involuntary confession from the plaintiff because their use of force was limited to effecting the arrest and not employed during the subsequent questioning
• explaining that identity evidence requires a signature and plan evidence requires “a broader plan or scheme” under Rule 404(b)
• explaining that identity evidence C-9 requires a signature and plan evidence requires “a broader plan or scheme” under Rule 404(b)
• finding use of physical force to subdue defendant resisting arrest did not render confession involuntary
• finding the means and methods used in two bank robberies too generic to permit an inference of identity under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b)
• finding use of physical force to subdue defendant resisting arrest did not render confession involuntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).